Quick Score

What you get

• A letter grade A through F + score out of 100
• 10-category bar chart— Security, Reliability, Maintainability, etc. so you can see where you're strong and where you're thin
• Three takeaway titles — the biggest things to address (full descriptions and fixes are in the paid tiers)
• Embeddable badge — drop into your README, anchored to the commit you submitted, 90-day freshness window
• Email follow-up — link to your result page; option to upgrade to a paid Standard ($2,000) review if you want the full findings

What you don't get (in the free tier)

• ·The full per-category breakdown with file:line citations — that's the paid Standard.
• ·Prioritized P0/P1/P2/P3 action list with effort estimates and cost-of-inaction.
• ·Decisions Required section, Open Questions section, or re-review delta tooling — paid only.
• ·A 30-minute walkthrough with Daniel — that's in the Standard ($2,000) tier.
• ·Human verification. Quick Score is generated by the same tooling we use for paid reviews, but it isn't finalized by a human engineer — that's what you pay for in Standard / Comprehensive.

What we score, and how

Quick Score uses the same 10-category HRC v2.0 rubric as every paid review — same weights, same letter-grade ladder. The score you get is calibrated against the same standard as our $2K and $4K reviews. The difference is depth of finding detail and human verification. Read the full rubric (Field Notes Vol 06) →

Not a generic LLM scan. Quick Score runs a deterministic pre-filter first (secrets, dep CVEs, config gaps) then feeds those findings into the LLM as facts — hybrid review, not pure LLM. Read “The Sycophancy Tax” (Field Notes Vol 07) →